IQ and Global Inequality is a controversial 2006 book by Dr. Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, and Dr. Tatu Vanhanen, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. IQ and Global Inequality is follow-up to their 2002 book IQ and the Wealth of Nations, an expansion of the argument that that international differences in current economic development are due in part to differences in average national intelligence as measured by average national IQ, and a response to critics.As with Lynn's book Race Differences in Intelligence, the book was not published by an academic publisher but by Washington Summit Publishers, which according to Southern Poverty Law Center has also reprinted "a range of classical and modern racist tracts, along with books on eugenics". Nevertheless, Lynn and Vanhanen's research on IQ and economic development has attracted academic attention from several fields, some of it very enthusiastic, some dismissive.

The Origins of AIDS takes us to the former Belgian Congo to investigate this controversial claim put forward by journalist Edward Hooper. In his book, The River: Journey to the Source of AIDS, he links the onset of AIDS to a mass polio vaccination in the 1950's when nearly a million Africans were injected with an experimental vaccine derived from

A Congolese student has launched legal action in Belgium to have the comic book "Tintin in the Congo" declared racist and removed from bookstores.

Copies of Tintin in the Congo have been removed from the children's section in Borders' New Zealand bookstores because of allegations the book is racist. The book has already received similar treatment in Britain and the United States.This has led to vigorous debate about whether to restrict the books to adults only.

Sample strips from Tintin In The Congo under this link.

Borders is removing a comic book “Tintin in the Congo” from the children’s section of its U.K. stores based on a customer complaint that the work is racist. This is a rebuttal of the reasoning behind that move. WARNING: This contains very strong language.